Putin had appointed Zaur Aleksandrovich Gurtsiev deputy mayor in Russia as reward for his military role in the invasion of Ukraine. He just died in an explosion, similar to the ones he unleashed on Ukranian civilians.
“Gurtsiev, despite his relatively young age, led the air part of the operation to [invade] Mariupol.”
“He introduced his developments in the technology of targeting missiles, which allowed them to increase their accuracy and effectiveness many times over, including hitting the Azov supply base.”
Russian forces seized control of the port city of Mariupol in 2022 following a brutal 86-day siege – one of the deadliest and most destructive battles since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine more than three years ago.
Fascists love to destroy meaning in language, because it allows them to say up is down and failure is their success. When nothing means anything, they can always be right and stay in power no matter how absurd their language devolves.
SpaceX’s latest unmanned Starship launch at first went off without a boom on Tuesday, but eventually broke up almost an hour after it took off.
After two test flights ended in dramatic explosions earlier this year, SpaceX’s ninth test of its Starship vehicle experienced a “rapid unscheduled disassembly” on Tuesday, May 27, SpaceX confirmed on X. That’s the same language used when Starship’s January and March flight tests unexpectedly exploded in the sky.
Notably, critics point to anti-diversity initiatives at SpaceX as causing accelerating brain drain, leaving the company in a state of rapid unscheduled disassembly (an aerospace phrase well known since the 1980s).
“With a test like this, success comes from what we learn…” [said] Musk, who called the flight test a “big improvement” from the last one…. This time around the booster catch was not attempted as SpaceX said it prioritizes… Mars. The team lost connection with its the booster, which had been expected to land in the Gulf of America. SpaceX was also unable to release eight mock objects resembling Starlink internet satellites as the ship’s door would not open wide enough, according to Hewitt. In another hiccup, the spacecraft started spinning, causing it to head toward the Indian Ocean for an uncontrolled landing… later confirmed that SpaceX eventually also lost contact with the ship itself, concluding Starship flight test nine. “We were not able to do a lot of our own orbit objectives today…
So much whiffing at bat by SpaceX throwing billions of dollars away, missing the ball entirely and causing massive environmental destruction, that… the pitcher throwing strikes soon will be so exhausted he’ll be forced to declare the other team the winner!
Isn’t that how American baseball works now?
The rich kid with the emerald encrusted stainless steel bat, throwing Hitler salutes to his six pregnant wives is declared the big winner after he strikes out over and over again? This May 27, 2025 picture of SpaceX has early American rocket design characteristics of 1950s (Nazi V-2 rocket technology developed by the slaves of Walter Thiel).Nazi German V2 Rocket, developed by slaves imprisoned by Walter Thiel
The contrast between SpaceX’s wasteful WWII-era (Nazi) approach and NASA’s more modern and methodical Cold War program with democratic regulation becomes clear when comparing the development philosophies and cost management.
Claiming “big improvements” when the primary vehicle is consistently lost illustrates how fascist propaganda frames progress, through selective emphasis on partial achievements, basically lying about gross harms, inefficiency and loss.
SpaceX mission objectives – deploying satellites, completing orbital maneuvers, demonstrating reentry – ALL REPEATEDLY FAILED AT HUGE COST.
Satellite deployment: FAIL (door wouldn’t open)
Orbital maneuvers: FAIL (spacecraft started spinning)
Repeatedly calling big failures a success makes accountability impossible, as the Nazis proved so dramatically in the late 1920s. The contrast in governance should be obvious:
NASA’s methodical approach delivered actual Mars landings starting in 1976 (Viking), followed by 50 years of successful missions like Pathfinder, Spirit, Opportunity, Curiosity, and PerseveranceNASA moon shot glass
SpaceX’s “spectacular failure show” approach, promised to have a man walking on Mars by 2018 and colonization by 2021, has yet to complete even basic orbital objectivesSource: Twitter
NASA vs SpaceX: Development Risk Comparison
Risk Metric
NASA “Hard Work” fail safe (e.g. SLS) landing on Mars since the 1970s
SpaceX Starship “Spectacular Failure Show” unable to even exit Earth’s orbit
Development Philosophy
Waterfall method with systematic reviews: System Requirements Review, Preliminary Design Review, Critical Design Review
“Fail fast, big show” approach with minimal testing before disasters
Flight Success Rate (2025)
100% – 1 successful launch (Artemis I, Nov 2022)
0% – 3 consecutive failures (Jan, Mar, May 2025)
Development Cost
$11.9 billion through 2018, with systematic verification and accounting at each checkpoint
Over $300 million in hardware losses from 3 recent failures alone, plus environmental/disruption costs
Cost Per Launch
$800 million – $4.1 billion (proven, functional system)
Theoretical and unproven with 0% success rate
Ground Testing Approach
Extensive ground testing, engine verification, structural testing before flight
Minimal testing, destructive remote explosions undermining research
Environmental Impact
Controlled launches from designated facilities with minimal debris
Debris scattered across Caribbean islands (Turks & Caicos, Bahamas)
Air Traffic Disruption
Standard aerospace coordination with minimal commercial flight impacts
Expanded hazard zones affecting 175+ flights, 40-minute delays costing $6,048/hour per flight
Hardware Reusability
Expendable, with proven track record and mission success
100% upper stage hardware loss rate in recent tests
Risk Management
Conservative approach prioritizing mission success and crew safety
High-risk approach with acceptance of catastrophic failures and total loss as unquantified and unmeasurable “learning experiences”
* Data compiled from multiple sources including NASA reports, SpaceX announcements, and aerospace industry analysis through May 2025. Beyond the $300+ million in direct hardware losses, there are the environmental remediation costs, FAA investigation expenses, and the economic impact of flight disruptions that don’t appear in SpaceX’s promotional materials.
We already reported on this crash, which was unusually tight-lipped. Now police are beginning to reveal how driverless software may be at fault. A Tesla operating like a ground-to-ground missile, crashed high speed into the back of a van, flipping it and killing its driver.
The driver of a van was killed in a rollover crash involving a Tesla and one other car on Interstate 95 in Pompano Beach on Saturday, Florida Highway Patrol said.
The crash happened just before 2 a.m. in the southbound lanes near Cypress Creek Road when, according to FHP, the driver of a black Tesla Model Y hit a Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 5000 from behind. […] Authorities said the Tesla driver “did not take driver action to avoid” the van….
In other words, authorities say Tesla Robotaxi software just killed a man because a Tesla operator didn’t stop the attack.
Notably, a rise in Tesla AI fatalities lately seem to be clustered around 2am and 3am, which crime investigators should register as a familiar pattern. I can explain, perhaps a topic for another day.
This Florida attack provides NatSec analysts more evidence of algorithmic assassination tactics on public roads, inherent to the deeply flawed Robotaxi “Technocracy” designs of population capture, control and murder.
Swasticars: Remote-controlled explosive devices stockpiled by Musk for deployment into major cities around the world.
Imagine 10,000 or more Swasticars deployed in an urban area, and you see how an Elon Musk plan for political power shift could be attempted through violent remote-controlled robot warriors. Austin, is the capitol of Texas, and soon it can be entirely disabled and captured by just one man who orders his robot fleets to attack.
…officials with Austin’s transportation department, the city’s emergency first responders, and federal regulators say that Tesla has failed to deliver crucial information regarding the service, which is supposed to go live in just a few days.
“Neun Autos gehen in Berlin in Flammen auf!” In 2024 on just one night in Berlin there were nine Tesla exploding like chemical bombs, allegedly a foreign power test of German urban emergency response capacity. Source: BZ
Or, as an unfortunately necessary counterpoint, the hacking community has known since at least 2016 that Tesla software is weak and susceptible to command and control by unauthorized outsiders (tampering and repudiation vulnerabilities, a throwback to “tipping” the flawed Nazi V1 bombers).Popular Mechanics Feb 1945
How many Nazi drones (derivative of the “Silicon Valley of the 1930s“) are on your roads today, or amassed near critical infrastructure and population centers? Measuring this is a legitimate national preparedness concern regarding foreign-backed terrorism. Märkische Allgemeine Zeitung (MAZ) is a regional newspaper in Brandenburg, Germany an area known for harboring and promoting Nazi sentiment (e.g. Peter Thiel, Elon Musk and AfD).
We’re getting close to needing police cruisers to be built like the WWII “Tempest” Nazi robot killer, with cannons setup to destroy Elon Musk’s Swasticars. Not an exaggeration, a Swasticar speeding like a ground-to-ground missile needs a modern and proportional NatSec response system to defend the nation. What would Sherman or Abrams do? WWII memorials now include public destruction of Tesla by veterans in a Sherman tank who remember fascism the first time around. Source: David Mirzoeff / Led By Donkeys / SWNS
Imagine being the guy who tries to show off how “awesome” his lawn dart is, long after everyone knows not to throw them anymore.
Source: Twitter, 2 April 2025
The only good part of the story here is they didn’t both die in a fire.
Notably he tags Tesla, as if the maker of a lawn dart of public roads doesn’t know they have a dangerously defective design. Tesla management probably looks at this video and just calls the owner stupid or reckless for trying to use FSD as advertised.
Let the Presto Crasho of FSD be a warning to everyone else. Don’t get in a Tesla. Don’t let friends or family get in a Tesla.
a blog about the poetry of information security, since 1995
