Very few details so far in this police report about Tesla killing another motorcyclist.
A motorbike and a Tesla Model 3 car were in collision in Epping New Road, near the junction with Rangers Road, at around 1.40pm on March 31.
At the time it was reported that the rider of the motorbike, a man in his 50s, was taken to hospital with life-threatening injuries. Police have now confirmed that he sadly died in hospital on Tuesday (May 6).
A 2025 celebration of victory in WWII apparently was a veteran using a Sherman tank to destroy a Tesla.
A British World War Two veteran has crushed a Tesla car with a Sherman tank on VE Day to fight the “spread of fascism by Elon Musk”.
Royal Engineer Ken Turner, 98, drove the massive tank over the expensive electric vehicle – which had ‘FASCISM’ on the number plate – leaving it a crushed mess. The now destroyed car was donated by a Tesla owner who is “appalled” by the support the company’s owner, Elon Musk, has given to the far-right in Europe.
In related news, total electric vehicle sales in the UK surged ahead in April.
…registrations of vehicles with a plug rose: plug-in hybrids (PHEV) up 34.1% and battery electric vehicles (BEV) increasing 8.1% to 24,558 units, taking more than a fifth (20.4%) of the market.
And on that note, the Nazi-associated brand Tesla was absolutely crushed in the market too according to Reuters.
Tesla’s already catastrophic Q1 sales collapse in Europe continues unabated in Q2, drawing comparisons to the Allied advances of Sherman tanks that rapidly swept fascists off the battlefield in WWII. The company’s decline spans multiple markets, with registrations plummeting across Germany, Holland, Denmark, Portugal, Sweden, and France.
While the UK previously was considered a Tesla holdout because of Musk’s aggressive English propaganda campaigns, April sales figures reveal a 62 percent bombing, calling into question how long this final European market will remain under the influence of Tesla invasion plans.
Peter Thiel’s family infamously fled Germany at the end of WWII to apartheid South Africa, where he could be raised in an ex-pat Nazi community. That’s a big part of why his Palantir company is so obviously and closely aligned with failed Nazi total surveillance objectives, as it reflects a continuation of thought.
Let me be more clear here for those unfamiliar with the Thiel doctrine behind Palantir.
All in all, Thiel exhibits a life filled with language of “struggle,” “monopoly,” “secrets,” and “conspiracies” that intentionally invokes totalitarian concepts, framing business success as belonging only to those who achieve dominance over others.
It all apparently comes from Thiel’s unapologetic social Darwinist upbringing in fascist enclaves outside of Germany. And we have zero evidence he has ever in any meaningful way tried to stop or condemn Nazism.
We even have a case where Palantir was briefly brought into modern Germany… only to be found working with modern day Nazis to attack politicians.
Unidentified police officers in Hesse accessed the contact details of several politicians and prominent immigrants from official records and shared them with the neo-Nazi group, according to local reports.
For other German families who stayed and went through occupation after the fall of Nazism, it’s a very different story. They too became “mysteriously” wealthy after genocide yet, unlike the Thiel family efforts to simply relocate and then return as before, the details of Nazi roots were hidden by those who remained in Germany.
…siblings Stefan Quandt and Susanne Klatten own more than 40% of BMW and are worth about $38 billion [thanks to their family operating] …battery factories in Berlin, where, thousands of forced slave laborers were used, including female slave laborers from concentration camps, you learn nothing about [this] history.
A Spiegel article now highlights 80% admit wealth came from crimes against humanity, while 80% also think it must not have been their own Nazi family to blame.
Only 20 percent “strongly disagree” with the idea that the prosperity of many families is still based on crimes committed during National Socialism. Yet almost 80 percent “strongly disagree” with the notion that their own family’s prosperity can be traced to such crimes.
It seems as though there is an unspoken agreement that dealing with the Nazi period can be outsourced to the memorial sites and museums and that families themselves are absolved from doing so in all but the most drastic cases.
The whole Spiegel article is worth a read, not least of all because Spiegel is German for “mirror”.
Tesla’s carefully crafted bogus image is finally unraveling. For over a decade, what many critics have called out as a calculated deception has managed to maintain its hold on the American market all the way into the corrupt DOGE breach of federal regulations. But China has had enough.
What many Americans still may not realize is that the first “driverless” Tesla fatality actually occurred in China, not the US. A brand new Tesla with autopilot engaged killed a young Chinese driver by accelerating directly into a clearly visible, bright yellow service vehicle displaying flashing caution lights.
This tragedy preceded the widely reported death of Josh Brown in Florida in April 2016, whose Tesla drove into the side of a truck. Following Brown’s death, Elon Musk boldly promised to eliminate crashes completely and enable coast-to-coast hands-free driving by 2017.
Fast forward to 2025, and Tesla vehicles appear more dangerous than ever. The alarming spike in Tesla-related fatalities during late 2024 and early 2025 tells its own story.
China has now taken decisive action. According to Motor Trend, Chinese authorities are effectively banning Tesla’s misleading autonomous driving claims:
…affected will be Tesla, which in the U.S. has long marketed its buggy and alarmingly inconsistent Level 2 driver assistance system as Full Self-Driving (now with “Supervised” appended to the name) and has routinely conducted beta testing of the technology on public roads.
“Part of the MIIT directive as we read it was a call to action to the OEMs to clean up the communication,” said Mercedes-Benz chairman and CEO Ola Källenius at Auto Shanghai 2025, where Mercedes unveiled a new, AI-powered, point-to-point advanced navigation and Level 2+ driver assistance system that requires drivers only to touch the steering wheel as the vehicle pretty much drives itself through city centers.
“I think that we have for the past 30 years been pretty straightforward to say what we can do and be very clear about what we can’t,” said Källenius, who pointed out Mercedes was the first automaker in China approved to conduct Level 3 autonomous driving testing on roads in Beijing. “So, it has not had any major effect on us.”
Consider the implications of Källenius’s statement: “No major effect on Mercedes.” This is particularly telling when you realize Mercedes not only secured Level 3 autonomous driving approval first but had already demonstrated such capabilities back in the 1980s.
The contrast couldn’t be clearer. While one “bad boy” company built its reputation on grandiose promises getting hundreds killed unnecessarily, everyone else in the market quietly delivered actual progress through honest engineering and transparent communication.