Epstein Files: Trump Hit 13-year Old Girl in Head When She Bit His Penis

Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act. His DOJ released three million pages.

And then, as NPR documented, it surgically withheld over 50 pages of FBI interviews.

With who?

With a woman who told agents that around 1983, when she was 13, Epstein introduced her to Trump. And that Trump forced her head down to his exposed penis, and when she bit down, he punched her in the head and threw her out.

The FBI interviewed this woman four times. Only the first interview made the public database, which means the one that doesn’t mention Trump.

A second woman similarly described being taken to Mar-a-Lago as a 13-year-old Epstein victim, where Epstein told Trump, “This is a good one, huh.”

That interview was published January 30, quietly pulled from the database, then restored February 19 after journalists noticed the gambit.

Rep. Robert Garcia has reviewed unredacted evidence logs at the DOJ and confirmed the files were illegally withheld.

Confirmed files. Illegally withheld.

The DOJ’s response has been to launch deranged lunatic rants like North Korea, claiming any criticism of Trump is “radical.” This is what institutional capture looks like in practice: you pass a transparency law, release a mountain of paper, and bury the pages that matter, to attack anyone who counts the serial numbers as the threat or conspiracy theorist.

Trump told reporters last week the files “totally exonerated” him. The files do the opposite, which is exactly why his stuffed crony DOJ doesn’t want anyone to hear the testimony about 13-year old girls.

Peter Thiel Caught Spying on Kids: Discord Backdoor Shitstorm Brews

Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund backs a controversial company called Persona Identities. Persona provides “age verification” to consumer platforms including Discord, OpenAI, Roblox, LinkedIn, and Lime.

Researchers have exposed Persona’s entire frontend architecture, with nearly 2,500 files at 53MB, sitting open on a FedRAMP government endpoint tagged with codenames from active intelligence programs. Fortune has the details, and the researchers published their findings on Twitter.

Yeah. FedRAMP. Exposed.

The files show Thiel’s Persona version of surveillance runs 269 distinct verification checks on users. These include the expected facial recognition against watchlists, but also screening against lists of politically exposed persons, and adverse media categorization across 14 categories including terrorism and espionage. The system assigns risk and similarity scores to every person.

EVERY person.

This is a biometric surveillance pipeline connected to Palantir money, deployed through consumer products, as a front to government intelligence infrastructure.

It is running right now on platforms used by hundreds of millions of people, including children, who believe they are just proving their age, unaware it’s literally Big Brother.

Discord Deployed, Not a Test

Earlier this month Discord defaulted all accounts to teen-safety settings.

ALL on by DEFAULT.

The announcement forced users into a binary: verify age using the Persona gate or lose platform access.

Discord hosts roughly 200 million monthly active users. Its population includes political organizers, activist communities, open source developers, security researchers, journalists and their sources, student groups, and gaming communities that overlap heavily with military-age males.

Thiel was targeting precisely the populations his private intelligence services would want to enumerate and categorize, as a Palantir-adjacent system.

Discord users specifically chose to join as a pseudonymous platform. They use handles, avatars, anonymous identities. Persona maps real biometric identity onto those pseudonymous accounts.

Before Thiel slammed in Persona, a Discord user was a handle. After the Thiel Persona gate was in place, that handle is linked to a face, a government ID, a watchlist status, a politically-exposed-person score, an adverse media categorization across terrorism and espionage categories.

The pseudonymity that made Discord attractive to its users is exactly what made it valuable to Thiel’s extremist ACTS 17 congregations as a collection target. The operation was to de-anonymize the precise population that specifically chose anonymity as protection from Thiel.

The Constitutional Bypass

The Fourth Amendment constrains what the government can compel from citizens. The political and legal cost of requiring 300 million people to submit biometrics to a federal database would be astronomical.

Thiel routed around American legal rights entirely. A private company provides “age verification” to platforms people already use. Users submit biometrics to Discord, not directly to the government. Persona processes the data as a private service provider.

The fact that data landed on FedRAMP government endpoints tagged with intelligence program codenames gives away the corruption. At no point does the state compel anything from anyone, because the surveillance becomes the product. The Third Party Doctrine that information voluntarily given to a third party loses Fourth Amendment protection does the rest.

This is obviously a laundering mechanism to undermine constitutional constraints on state power. The private sector collects what the state cannot legally demand. Commercial authorization frameworks move the data to government infrastructure. The child safety language is disinformation to make opposition politically suicidal.

The Franchise Model

The Thiel portfolio has to be seen as a vertically integrated surveillance supply chain to understand his documented upbringing as a Nazi.

Compulsion Thiel backs politicians — Vance, Trump — who support age verification mandates. Bipartisan cover is guaranteed because child safety is politically inarguable. These mandates create legal pressure for civilians to submit biometrics through consumer products they already use.
Collection Persona embeds in platforms where billions of users live. Age verification framing makes biometric submission feel routine and protective. Users submit to Discord or Roblox, not to the government. Every parent who consents on behalf of a minor is enrolling a child in a system whose back end they cannot see.
Processing Persona’s 269 checks are a civilian threat assessment engine. Watchlist matching, politically exposed persons screening, adverse media categorization, risk scoring. This is intelligence-grade analysis running on people who think they are confirming a birthday.
Bridging FedRAMP authorization formalizes the government channel. Persona CEO Rick Song frames this as “workforce security.” The infrastructure is bidirectional. Once civilian biometrics sit on government-authorized endpoints tagged with intelligence program codenames, the distinction between “workforce verification” and “population surveillance” is a configuration setting.
Action Palantir correlates identity data with intelligence streams. Anduril operationalizes it for defense and border enforcement. The supply chain runs from a teenager’s selfie on Discord to an actionable targeting package.

Each platform is an independent collection node. Each has its own justification. Each feeds the same backend. Each can be severed independently if exposed without disrupting the others.

Discord got burned and got cut off.

Persona continues operating through OpenAI, Roblox, LinkedIn, and Lime.

The Rollback Story

Last year, hackers accessed 70,000 government IDs collected through Discord’s previous verification vendor, 5CA. Discord’s response to that breach was to switch vendors — to Persona, which has deeper capability and a direct pipeline to government infrastructure. The breach provided cover for upgrading the collection system.

When researchers published that Persona’s architecture was sitting on government endpoints, the cleanup began immediately. Discord cuts ties. Both companies coordinate messaging to say the partnership lasted “less than a month.” Song tells Fortune the exposed files are just “uncompressed frontend” and that internally this was not considered a major vulnerability. He posted screenshots of an email exchange with the researcher, claiming the implication of connections between Persona, Palantir, and ICE has led to threats against company employees.

The data that flowed during that month already flowed. The biometrics already hit the government endpoint. The watchlist checks already ran. The 269 verification checks already executed against every user who submitted. Dissolving the partnership does not un-run those checks.

A since-deleted version of Discord’s FAQ on age verification contradicts the company’s claims about data retention, stating information would be “temporarily stored for up to 7 days.”

Discord amended its universal age-verification announcement to say verification would be “optional” — unless users want access to age-restricted servers and channels, which means most of the platform’s actual functionality. This is compulsion through architecture rather than law.

A CEO Knows

Song was attacked for lacking a profile photo on his own LinkedIn page — the same LinkedIn whose identity verification Persona handles. His response: “It’s dystopian that we want people to facedox themselves to everyone to be real online.”

The CEO of a facial recognition verification company argues against making faces publicly visible — while his product links faces to identity databases, intelligence watchlists, and government endpoints for hundreds of millions of people. He knows linking faces to identity databases is dangerous. He built a system that does it at population scale. His defense is that he personally should not have to participate.

That is hierarchy, stated plainly. The system makes identity transparent downward and opaque upward.

Recognition Time

In 2009, Peter Thiel wrote that freedom and democracy are incompatible. He was describing a design constraint. Democracy creates legal barriers to population-scale surveillance. Market mechanisms achieve what democratic governance prohibits.

Age verification mandates are spreading across state legislatures. Persona is embedded in platforms used by hundreds of millions of people. FedRAMP authorization formalizes the government pipeline. The administration dismantling institutional checks — inspectors general fired, DOGE gutting federal agencies, loyalty tests replacing competence — is the same administration receiving the output of this biometric collection network.

The 269 checks exist now. The watchlist screening exists now. The politically exposed persons matching exists now. The adverse media categorization across terrorism and espionage categories exists now. The intelligence program codenames exist for a reason that Discord isn’t disclosing. The question is whether anyone treats this Thiel story as the emergency it already is.

Epstein Connection to Khmer Loot Reveals Blood on MoMA Hands

Looting vulnerable populations and laundering their assets through institutional prestige has a long, documented history.

Look at how Prussia strip-mined the Ottoman territory and built their Pergamon museum around the loot. Look at how the Nazis then systematized that art theft across occupied Europe. The hunt for all the stolen works continues eight decades later.

Don’t look too hard in the estates around the Wannsee.

Powerful actors extract cultural wealth from people in crisis, then use institutional credibility to convert stolen goods into legitimate collections.

Enter Epstein.

Leon Black paid a convicted sex trafficker over $150 million for “financial advice” on looting. That trafficker’s files contain an inventory of Black’s $27.7 million collection of Southeast Asian antiquities, which happen to be objects extracted from Cambodian sites during conflicts that killed roughly two million people.

The supply chain for these objects runs through mass violence, displacement, and exploitation of vulnerable populations.

It brings to light Douglas Latchford’s network, which depended on local labor operating under coercion or desperation in conflict zones to loot these sites. Trafficking in looted cultural property produced by conditions indistinguishable from trafficking in persons. Latchford published one of Black’s pieces in a book, corresponded about selling bronzes to Black, and when an Australian museum canceled a purchase over insufficient provenance, redirected the same piece toward Black. He was indicted for fraud and conspiracy in trafficking Cambodian artifacts. His family returned the collection to Cambodia. The Metropolitan Museum returned 14 sculptures. The US government returned 30 objects.

Black still has his, somehow.

Epstein’s files contain the inventory of these looted acquisitions. I mean Epstein had operational visibility into Black’s holdings. The same Epstein whose own operation depended on exploiting vulnerable people. The financial plumbing connects both trafficking streams together. The wealth extracted through cultural looting in conflict zones, is managed by an operation funded through sexual exploitation.

The Epstein network actively gatekept women out of professional advancement while trafficking girls. Same dehumanization, different expression. Hatred as doctrine underlies the trafficking to make it possible. Trafficking humans by definition is the act of regarding some as lesser, if not inhuman.

The same files show Epstein explicitly ordered women excluded from elite scientific conferences he funded. “The women are all weak, and a distraction,” he wrote to literary agent John Brockman. Larry Summers joked about women’s IQ. A Yale computer scientist described a female undergrad to Epstein as a “v small good-looking blonde.” The network that looted Cambodian antiquities and trafficked underage girls also systematically excluded women from professional advancement. The dehumanization is the operating system.

Looting, trafficking, gatekeeping.

Black’s spokesperson offers the standard laundering fallacy: looting was done “through a well-regarded and highly reputable art dealer.”

Yeah, we get it. Trump and Epstein were well-regarded. Latchford was reputable too right up until his indictment. An Australian museum canceling a purchase for insufficient provenance, followed by Latchford redirecting that piece to Black, shows conscious avoidance that normally triggers trafficking statutes.

The “reputation” defense works the same in every laundering operation from 1880s Berlin to 1940s Paris to 2013 New York. Buy through a middleman to claim distance from the act. Hire a hit man to say you didn’t do the hit.

Black “cooperated” with a DOJ inquiry five years ago. And then? Somehow he remains a MoMA trustee, a known Epstein associate who now shows up flaunting the files.

…art insiders were wide-eyed to see Black, as well as fellow Epstein pal Glenn Dubin, stride into a private party, apparently hosted by the [MoMA] institution itself…. Black…stepped down as chairman of the museum in 2021 after protest from artists and workers over his connections to Epstein. On Tuesday, a rep for Black told us, “Mr. Black was proud to be at the dinner….” Both Black and Dubin have galleries in MoMA named after them.

The Nazis looted art and trafficked underage girls, building their white man’s empire atop mass suffering. The Epstein network does the same. Black represents how an institutional playbook for elites converts mass atrocity into cultural capital even today.

Cybertruck Officially 17X Less Safe Than Ford Pinto

While Tesla was busy confessing to the California DMV that Autopilot was never real, FuelArc ran the numbers on the Cybertruck’s fire fatality rate against the Ford Pinto — the historic benchmark for corporate greed killing customers.

The Cybertruck is 17 times worse.

SEVENTEEN TIMES WORSE THAN A PINTO

Five fire fatalities in 34,438 vehicles gives the Cybertruck a fatality rate of 14.52 per 100,000 units.

The Ford Pinto, across a decade of production and 3.17 million vehicles, managed 0.85.

The Pinto became a national scandal.

The Cybertruck army of Elon Musk adherents sent a death threat to the journalist who did math.

The NHTSA still hasn’t crash-tested the Cybertruck. Tesla still hasn’t released official delivery numbers. And the company that just admitted its entire “driverless” branding was a lie is simultaneously selling an untested vehicle that burns its occupants at a rate that would have gotten any other manufacturer shut-down and hauled before Congress.

The Pinto at least had the excuse of being a Ford, and cheap.

The Cybertruck, marketed as a “survivalist” design, costs six figures for a barely operational bucket of half-baked bolts that kills faster than the Pinto.