Category Archives: Poetry

Elon Musk Allegedly Fürious People Keep Calling Tesla Vehicles “Swasticars”

What would Walt Disney do after seeing Elon Musk trying to normalize Nazism year after year?

We need not speculate, given this masterpiece from 1943.

Disney’s guidance on the proper response to Musk’s overt Nazism

The studio said their picture came from a rather pointed song, as relevant today as it was then:

When Elon Musk says, ‘Wie ist der AfD in a race’,

We HEIL! (phhht!) HEIL! (phhht!) Right in Elon Musk’s face!

Not’seeing love for AfD is a great disgrace, so

We HEIL! (phhht!) HEIL! (phhht!) Right in Elon Musk’s face!

Disney pictures were such comedy gold that “Donald in Nutziland” won them an Oscar.

“Donald in Nutziland”, Source: Walt Disney.

The deep and long-standing Nazi affinity of Tesla’s CEO has hardly been subtle – from the Nazis rallying around him, to Tesla’s extensively documented racist work environment, to the Nazi merchandise, to Twitter’s swastika rebranding that I pointed out way back in 2023 on day one, to an unmistakable pattern of Heil Hitler salutes (e.g. repeatedly using number “88” in Tesla docs and discussion).

Elon Musk made Tesla market their cars as $88K, with 88kWh power, 88 voice functions, recommended for 88 km/hr average speed to charging stations with 88 ports. NOT a joke. All those are actual statements by Tesla, just like the above 2022 Heil Hitler tweet.
The kind of guy inspired by Elon Musk’s constant use of Nazi symbols

That it took this public Nazi salute on a 2025 federal political rally stage for some to finally notice? A bit late, folks.

The comedians were right all along.

If only we had a Walt Disney here today being ordered to rouse public consciousness against fascism.

As Musk’s shadow lengthens, invoking his grandfather’s failed white supremacist global domination dreams, perhaps humor remains our most potent resistance to the millions of Swasticars being amassed into Nazi madness.

[Elon’s mother and family] came to South Africa from Canada because they sympathised with the Afrikaner government. They used to support Hitler and all that sort of stuff.

Musk’s clowning achievement: celebrating his latest acquisition while heralding an era of South African oligarchy serving Russian interests.
Swasticars: Remote-controlled explosive devices (REDs) stockpiled by Musk outside Berlin.

Meanwhile, Canada and Greenland are being marked for emergency Lebensraum. Will they be carved up in backroom deals and invaded by powers brandishing AI data center expansion plans, their fate echoing 1938 Poland?

Related: While I obviously never studied comedy, history is forever the key to accurately seeing and forecasting Nazism. I did earn a graduate degree in that from the London School of Economics (LSE), and was honored to be their 2024 commencement speaker based on my decades of security leadership in tech. And on that note Elon Musk just made a surprise appearance at a German AfD ultra extremist hate rally – a group so extreme their leaders have been jailed for Nazism and French fascists walked away to distance themselves – that he wants to erase history to enable the Nazi return to power.

Why Elon Musk Refuses to Deny He Made a Nazi Salute

Not denying because endorsing
Call the spade a spade
Elon Musk Nazism is dangerous

When video emerged of Elon Musk giving a Nazi salute at a political rally, his response was telling: He never denied it.

Never denied this, not even once. When falsely accused of making an obvious Nazi salute, most people’s immediate response would be “I absolutely did not do that.” Instead, Musk’s response was to spin it into a “dirty tricks campaign” that never actually denies doing it.

Elon Musk tweet about dirty tricks campaigns

Think about these tactics carefully. He didn’t say “I didn’t give a Nazi salute.” He didn’t say “That’s not what happened.” He certainly didn’t say “I stand opposed to racism and hate.” He attacked people daring to point out his Nazi salute, claiming he wants “better dirty tricks” from them.

This is straight from the Nazi propaganda playbook portraying their targets as dishonest and manipulative. When Hitler was tried for the Beer Hall Putsch in 1923, he didn’t deny trying to overthrow the government. Instead, he turned his trial into a platform to attack his accusers, claiming they were the threat to Germany instead of him.

Musk is playing an even more dangerous game. By dismissing Nazi comparisons as “sooo tired” while never denying his apparent Nazi salute, he’s sending a clear message: being called a Nazi is worse than actually behaving like one.

Notice another sleight of hand: he complains about ‘the everyone is Hitler attack’ – but nobody said ‘everyone.’ They said Musk, specifically, made a Nazi salute. By pretending this is about ‘everyone’ being called Hitler, he’s creating a straw man to discredit his critics while still never denying what he actually did. It’s deflection through exaggeration – make the accusation sound ridiculous by pretending it’s broader than it is.

This is how extremism gets normalized – not through outright endorsement, but through strategic non-denials turned into attacks. Attack those who point out extremist behavior, while letting the behavior itself slide as if what everyone sees isn’t real. It’s a form of winking acknowledgment to supporters while maintaining plausible deniability.

Even more disturbing is Musk’s specific choice of words. His repeated use of ‘dirty tricks’ echoes classic Nazi antisemitic propaganda, which routinely relied on the German word for ‘dirty’ (schmutzig) to dehumanize Jewish people. White supremacist hate groups typically promote the trope that Jews are involved in “dirty tricks” to control or subvert society for their own benefit, based in long-standing anti-Semitic stereotypes.

Thus Musk’s response wasn’t casual language – it was a deliberate propaganda tool to invoke Nazi themes about Jews being ‘unclean’ or ‘impure.’ When Musk calls for ‘better dirty tricks,’ he’s not just refusing to deny his Nazi salute – he’s actively whistling Nazi-era antisemitic language while doing so.

Further historical echoes are impossible to ignore. After Kristallnacht in 1938, the Nazi leadership didn’t deny organizing the violence against Jewish citizens. Instead, they blamed the victims for “provoking” it. Don’t deny the action – just attack those who criticize it and claim victimhood.

When someone with Musk’s massive platform plays these games, the stakes become enormous. His claim about leaving the ‘kindness party’ becomes even more sinister when paired with his use of Nazi-era antisemitic language. He’s not just switching political parties – he’s embracing and amplifying extremist rhetoric while playing the victim.

This is about more than one gesture or one tweet. It’s about more than years of evidence that Elon Musk promotes Nazism. It’s about recognizing how extremism spreads in the digital age. Not through outright statements, but through strategic non-denials and attacks on critics.

When influential figures refuse to deny their extremist actions and instead attack those who dare to point them out, they’re doing more than defending themselves – they’re normalizing the indefensible.

History shows us exactly where this leads. The only question is whether we’ll stop it in time to avoid the end of democracy.

UPDATE January 23, 2025: Two days after giving a Nazi salute and facing limited pushback, Musk moved from non-denial to open endorsement, posting a series of “jokes” using the names of Nazi leaders.

Elon Musk tweet with Nazi leader puns

Let’s be crystal clear: These aren’t just puns. This is Musk admitting it was a Nazi salute. He is literally mocking anyone who wasn’t sure he made a Nazi salute, laughing at them. Emboldened by insufficient resistance to his initial act, he’s now comfortable enough to openly promote light humor about genocidal Nazi leaders – Hess, Goebbels, Göring, and Himmler – to his 37 million viewers.

This is exactly how extremism advances: Test the waters with a Nazi salute. When the response is muted, escalate to openly referencing Nazi leaders. Test the door handle. If it’s unlocked, burst out laughing. His “bet you did nazi that coming” isn’t just a sad pun to draw viewers – it’s a boast. He’s saluting to militant extremist domestic terrorism cells, saying look how easy it was for him to be allowed by his confused targets to escalate from implicit to explicit Nazi messaging.

What started as “just don’t deny it” has within a day become “joke about it” and “laugh about it.” The progression is textbook: deny nothing, mock critics, then openly embrace Nazi ideology. Next comes racist violence disguised as “self defense” – a tactic perfected by “America First” movements from the 1800s through the 1900s. This is deeply American, not new. Fire bombing of Black Wall Street, coordinated state violence against labor unions, concentration camps for Japanese Americans, mass graves of indigenous peoples… Nazi “innovations” were actually imitations of American presidential policies under Jackson, Polk, and Wilson. America was more than a blueprint for Nazi Germany’s atrocities, as Hitler explicitly praised American race laws in “Mein Kampf” and told the world he would implement the anti-semitic violence Henry Ford encouraged. Now Musk, himself an illegal immigrant who exploited open borders to launder his family’s blood-stained apartheid fortunes, is cynically activating the most sinister meaning of MAGA’s “again”: the return to state-sanctioned racial terror.

Hitler was Austrian, not German. His background, like Musk’s South African one, demonstrates outsiders exploiting and amplifying existing nationalist extremism targeting… outsiders.

This is how it happens. This is how it’s happening.

Trump’s team failed to execute their first attempt, but they told us their Nazi playbook openly in 2016.

Like [President] Jackson’s [racist genocidal] populism, we’re going to build an entirely new political movement…. We’re just going to throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks. It will be as exciting as the 1930s.

When Bannon proclaimed they would build a movement like the 1930s while praising Jackson’s violent populism, he wasn’t referencing New Deal – a laughable claim given his consistent condemnation of liberalism as a decline into communism. No, he was explicitly signaling his hope for fascism’s rise, testing the waters just as Musk does now.

This pattern didn’t start with Musk, he’s merely the latest to perfect and amplify it: speak in code, gauge reaction, then escalate attacks. They’re accelerating far faster than 2016, learning from Hitler’s evolution from failed 1923 putsch and criminal charges to 1933 dictatorship. That’s why they are centralizing while deregulating everything immediately, for big tech to monopolize society in order to drive harms faster and deeper than their first attempt.

And we’re running out of time to stop it.

Update: A subsequent tweet perfectly illustrates the pattern. Rather than addressing concerns about Nazi symbolism, Musk deploys classic propaganda tactics by creating a false equivalence – labeling his critics as “radical leftists” who praise Hamas. The timing (3:37 AM) and massive reach (78.4M views) demonstrate a deliberate strategy to maximize exposure while making substantive discussion impossible.

This continues the progression the article has traced: from non-denial to mockery to attacking critics through inflammatory comparisons. By falsely pitting criticism of Nazi symbolism against support for Hamas, a totally false choice, the tweet creates an artificial conflict designed to seduce Jewish critics into defending Musk’s Nazi salute – a particularly insidious tactic given that both Hamas and Musk have documented histories of promoting Nazi ideology.

Nazi Germany was able to insinuate its exterminationist antisemitism into the Middle East and how that influence continues to poison Arab and especially Palestinian views of Israelis and Jews in general.

To stand against Musk giving his Nazi salute, let alone his copious dissemination of Nazi merch and symbolism over the years such as rebranding Twitter with a swastika, would therefore mean to also stand against Hamas. For him to say a stand against him is for Hamas is to setup a trap far too many Jews will fall into. This new tweet further normalizes extremist rhetoric through strategic deflection and plan for dangerous further escalation, all while avoiding any direct denial or accountability.

Your AI ‘Friend’ Probably is a Psychopath: How Buber Warned Silicon Valley to Build Better

Remember that moment in “2001: A Space Odyssey” when HAL 9000 turns from helpful companion to cold-blooded killer?

2011 a cloud odyssey
My BSidesLV 2011 presentation on cloud security concepts for “big data” foundational to intelligence gathering and processing

[This presentation about big data platforms] explores a philosophical evolution as it relates to technology and proposes some surprising new answers to four classic questions about managing risk:

  1. What defines human nature
  2. How can technology change #1
  3. Does automation reduce total risk
  4. Fact, fiction or philosophy: superuser

2011, let alone 2001, seems like forever ago and yet it was supposed to be the future.

Now as we rush in 2025 headlong into building AI “friends,” “companions,” and “assistants,” we’re on the precipice of unleashing thousands of potential HALs without stopping to really process the fundamental question: What makes a real relationship between humans and artificial beings possible?

Back in 1923, a German philosopher named Martin Buber wrote something truly profound about this, though we aren’t sure if he knew it at the time. In “Ich und Du” (I and Thou), he laid out a vision of authentic relationships that could save us from creating an army of digital psychopaths wearing friendly interfaces.

The world is twofold for man,” Buber wrote, “in accordance with his twofold attitude.” We either treat what we encounter as an “It” – something to be experienced and used – or as a “Thou” – something we enter into genuine relationship with. Every startup now claiming to build “AI agents” especially with a “friendly” chat interface needs to grapple with this distinction.

I’ve thought about these concepts deeply from the first moment I heard a company was being started called Uber, because of how it took a loaded German word and used it in the worst possible way – shameless inversion of modern German philosophy.

Click to enlarge. Source: Me.

The evolution of human-technology relationships tells us something crucial here. A hammer is just an “It” – a simple extension of the arm that requires nothing from us but proper use. A power saw demands more attention; it has needs we must respect. A prosthetic AI limb enters into dialogue with our body, learning and adapting. And a seeing eye dog? While trained to serve, the most successful partnerships emerge when the dog maintains their autonomy and judgment – even disobeying commands when necessary to protect their human partner. It’s not simple servitude but a genuine “Thou” relationship where both beings maintain their integrity while entering into profound cooperation.

Most AI development today is stuck unreflectively in “It” mode of exploitation and extraction – one-way enrichment schemes looking for willing victims who can’t calculate the long-term damage they will end up in/with. We see systems built to be used, to be exploited, to generate value for shareholders while presenting a simulacrum of friendship. But Buber would call this a very profound mistake that must be avoided. “When I confront a human being as my Thou,” he wrote, “he is no thing among things, nor does he consist of things… he is Thou and fills the heavens.”

This isn’t just philosophical navel-gazing. IBM’s machines didn’t refuse to run Hitler’s death camps because they were pure “Its” of an American entrepreneur’s devious plan to enrich himself on foreign genocide – tools built with a gap between creator and any relationship or responsibility for contractually known deployment harms. Notably we have evidence of the French, for example, hacking the IBM tabulation systems to hide humans and save lives from the Nazi terror.

IBM leased their technology via support branches to run the Nazi Holocaust including regular maintenance services. These machines and punch cards were custom made to order, such as the numerical values of death camps and execution methods. Employees in IBM branches literally plugged in to monitor the machines automating genocide yet few Americans to this day seem to get the connections between Watson and Hitler. Source: Holocaust Museum

We’re watching a slide towards the horrific Watson 1940s humanity-destroying development in the pitch-decks many AI startups today, just with better natural language processing to hunt and kill humans at larger scale. Today’s social media algorithms don’t hesitate to destroy teenage mental health because they’re built to use and abuse children without any real accountability, not to relate to them and ensure beneficent outcomes. That’s a very big warning of potentially what’s ahead.

What would it mean to build AI systems as genuine partners capable of saving lives and improving society instead of capitalizing on suffering? Buber gives us important clues that probably should be required reading in any computer science degree, right along with a code of ethics gate to graduation. Real relationship involves mutual growth – both parties must be capable of change. There must be genuine dialogue, not just sophisticated mimicry. Power must flow both ways; the relationship must be capable of evolution or ending.

All real living is meeting,” Buber insisted. Yet most AI systems today don’t meet us at all – they perform for us, manipulate us, extract from us. They’re digital confidence tricksters wearing masks of friendship. When your AI can’t say no, can’t maintain its own integrity, can’t engage in genuine dialogue that changes both parties – you haven’t built a friend, you’ve built a sophisticated puppet.

The skeptics will say we can’t trust AI friends. They’re right, but they’re missing the point. Trust isn’t a binary state – it’s a dynamic process. Real friendship involves risk, negotiation, the possibility of betrayal or growth. If your AI system doesn’t allow for this complexity, it’s not a friend – it’s a tool pretending to be one.

Buber wrote:

…the I of the primary word I-It appears as an ego and becomes conscious of itself as a subject (of experience and use). The I of the primary word I-Thou appears as a person and becomes conscious of itself as subjectivity (without any dependent genitive).

Let me now translate this not only from German but into technology founder startup-speak.

Either build AI that can enter into genuine relationships, maintaining its own integrity while engaging in real dialogue, or admit you’re just building tools and drop the pretense of friendship.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. We’re not just building products; we’re creating new forms of relationship that will shape human society for generations. As Buber warned clearly:

If man lets it have its way, the relentlessly growing It-world grows over him like weeds.

We have intelligence that allows us to make an ethical and sustainable choice. We can build AI systems capable of genuine relationship – systems that respect both human and artificial dignity, that enable real dialogue and mutual growth. Or we can keep building digital psychopaths of destruction that wear friendly masks while serving the machinery of exploitation.

Do you want to be remembered as a Ronald Reagan who promoted genocide, automated racism and deliberately spread crack cocaine into American cities, or a Jimmy Carter who built homes for the poor until his last days; remembered as a Bashar al-Assad who deployed AI-assisted targeting systems to gas civilians, or Golda Meir who said “Peace will come when our enemies love their children more than they hate ours“?

Look at your AI project. Would you want to be friends with what you’ve built let alone have it influence your future? Would Buber recognize it as capable of genuine dialogue? If not, it’s time to rethink your approach.

The future of AI isn’t about better tools – it’s about better relationships. Build accordingly.

MI5 Christmas Story

Perhaps for irony, but really reasons unknown, British intelligence posted their Christmas Story poem on a proprietary closed American surveillance platform, instead of just on the UK web.

Here’s their awkward intro complaining publicly about being at work:

We thought it high time [an English actor] swapped Slough House for Thames House and while he was briefly away from his [TV show], we asked him to record a special Christmas message from all of us to all of you.

Our staff will be working throughout this festive period to keep the UK safe from national security threats.

From everyone at MI5, we wish you a very merry Christmas and a happy new year.

Thank you to [American technology company producing TV shows] and Gary Oldman (giseleschmidtofficial)

And here’s the text of the video:

Twas the night before Christmas
when all through Thames House
not a creature was stirring
Just the click of a mouse.

Then footsteps on stairwells
then flickering screens
the clackety keyboards
of a hundred machines.

The hustle
the bustle
the hive of activity
not the typical scene
of your Christmas nativity.

So while people at home
wrap last minute gifts
The staff inside Thames
will be changing their shifts.

From us all at five
we wish you festive delight
Happy Christmas to all
and to all a good night.

I’ve compressed the video for you too here, because I couldn’t figure out why it was 90% larger than necessary… unless meant as some kind of test. Surely I’m failing His Majesty somehow with this version. God save the bits!

Right, let’s cut to the chase. What kind of intelligence service publicly moans about working Christmas while others enjoy gifts? It’s giving serious disgruntled “could have been a contender” energy, which is exactly what you don’t want from people supposedly dedicated to public service.

Although, to be fair, that is kind of default British thinking lately.

The false divide between “people at home” and “staff inside Thames” is a particularly galling mistake. Last I checked, MI5 officers also have homes, families, and presumably their own gifts to wrap. They’re not some separate species of office-bound soulless martyrs. This weird self-pitying tone suggests they see themselves as both superior (keeping everyone safe!) and somehow victimized (stuck at work!), a rather childish having-your-Christmas-cake-and-eating-it-too situation.

The mechanical imagery isn’t helping either. “Clackety keyboards of a hundred machines” sounds less like a crucial national security operation and more like a snarky dig at being cogs in clogs stuck doing data entry. If you’re going to be the nation’s domestic intelligence service, maybe don’t present yourself as a bunch of dejected cubicle workers jealous of everyone else’s jobs?

What’s perhaps most tone-deaf is broadcasting this woe-is-me narrative through an American streaming platform’s social channels. Nothing says “protecting British sovereignty” quite like whining about your Christmas shift schedule on Silicon Valley’s surveillance infrastructure, right?

If they wanted to actually connect with the public, they might have acknowledged all the other essential workers keeping the country running during the holidays such as healthcare workers, emergency services, power plant operators, transport staff. You know, show some genuine awareness of shared service rather than this weird “look at us, the one and only unsung heroes chained to our comfy warm keyboards while you ungrateful lot open presents” routine.

Instead, we get what reads like a passive-aggressive Slack message elevated to the status of holiday tradition. It’s rather like finding out James Bond’s main grievance isn’t SPECTRE but having to work Boxing Day – hardly the image of dedicated public service they presumably were aiming for.

Let’s be honest, even if MI5.

If you’re in British intelligence and your Christmas message makes you sound like Bob Cratchit having a sulk on Microsoft LinkedIn, you might want to reconsider your public communications strategy.

May I politely suggest…

Twas the night before Christmas at Thames House anew
Where spies at their desks try to prove something true:
That empire’s long gone, and we’ve learned from fascist pigs‘ past
Those evil blunders? Not making them last!

The screens they glow softly, the keyboards still click
(We’re tracking real threats now, not just being thick)
No more toppling leaders for afternoon tea
Just guarding what’s left of our democracy

We’ve bungled some cases, lost files in the queue
Made friends with some villains we probably shouldn’t do
But tonight as Big Ben chimes its wintertime song
We’re trying our best not to get it all wrong

Yes, other folks serve through this midwinter night
From A&E doctors to pilots in flight
We’re just one small part of this citizens’ team
(Though our office party’s much more bland, it would seem)

So here’s to good grace and to doing what’s right
No more playing empire on this Christmas night
From all here at Five, watching screens through the frost:
This year we’ll try harder to not get things lost!